β2-Glycoprotein I/HLA class II complexes are novel autoantigens in antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by thrombosis and/or pregnancy complications. β2-glycoprotein I (β2GPI) complexed with phospholipid is recognized as a major target for autoantibodies in APS; however, less than half the patients with clinical manifestations of APS possess autoantibodies against the complexes. Therefore, the range of autoantigens involved in APS remains unclear. Recently, we found that human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II molecules transport misfolded cellular proteins to the cell surface via association with their peptide-binding grooves. Furthermore, immunoglobulin G heavy chain/HLA class II complexes were specific targets for autoantibodies in rheumatoid arthritis. Here, we demonstrate that intact β2GPI, not peptide, forms a complex with HLA class II molecules. Strikingly, 100 (83.3%) of the 120 APS patients analyzed, including those whose antiphospholipid antibody titers were within normal range, possessed autoantibodies that recognize β2GPI/HLA class II complexes in the absence of phospholipids. In situ association between β2GPI and HLA class II was observed in placental tissues of APS patients but not in healthy controls. Furthermore, autoantibodies against β2GPI/HLA class II complexes mediated complement-dependent cytotoxicity against cells expressing the complexes. These data suggest that β2GPI/HLA class II complexes are a target in APS that might be involved in the pathogenesis (read more)

Assessing Antibody Strength: Comparison of MFI, C1q, and Titer Information

The presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies before or after transplantation may have different implications based on the antibody strength. Yet, current approaches do not provide information regarding the true antibody strength as defined by antigen–antibody dissociation rate. To assess currently available methods, we compared between neat mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values, C1q MFI values, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-treated samples, as well as titration studies and peak MFI values of over 7000 Luminex-based single-antigen HLA antibody data points. Our results indicate that neat MFI values do not always accurately depict antibody strength. We further showed that EDTA treatment (6%) does not always remove all inhibitory factors compared with C1q or titration studies. In this study of patients presenting with multiple antibody specificities, a prozone effect was observed in 71% of the cohort (usually not affecting all antibody specificities within a single serum sample, though). Similar to titration studies, the C1q assay was able to address the issue of potential inhibition; however, its limitation is its low sensitivity and inability to detect the presence of weak antibodies. Titration studies are the only method among the approaches used in this study to provide information suggesting antigen–antibody dissociation rates and are, therefore, likely to provide better indication of true antibody strength (read more)

Transfer of HLA-Specific Allosensitization From a Highly Sensitized Deceased Organ Donor to the Recipients of Each Kidney

We report for the first time the adoptive transfer of donor HLA-specific allosensitization in two recipients following kidney transplantation from a highly sensitized donor. Kidneys from a donation after circulatory death donor were transplanted into two nontransfused, HLA-specific antibody negative males receiving their first transplant. Antibody screening 7 days after transplant showed high level de novo IgG HLA class I- and class II-specific antibodies in both recipients, with largely overlapping antibody profiles but no antibodies to donor HLA. The unusually rapid appearance of de novo alloantibodies in immunosuppressed nonsensitized recipients and absence of donor HLA-specific antibody prompted testing of stored donor serum that revealed high antibody levels with specificities very similar to those seen in both recipients, but in addition the presence of strong antibodies to each recipient HLA. Alloantibody levels gradually declined but were still detectable at 3 months. These findings suggest that alloreactive passenger B cells/plasma cells within the kidneys of highly sensitized donors may give rise to rapid development of posttransplant de novo HLA-specific alloantibodies. While the clinical significance of this phenomenon is uncertain it provides one explanation for the appearance of de novo HLA-specific antibodies directed against third party but not donor HLA (read more)

Maintaining immunosuppressive treatment after early allograft nephrectomy does not reduce the risk of anti-HLA allo-sensitization

Early loss of a kidney allograft within the first days or weeks after transplantation occurs in 3–5% of kidney-transplant patients (1) (2). It is mainly caused by artery and/or vein allograft thrombosis (2), and requires a rapid allograft nephrectomy. We have previously shown that, even after a short transplant period, donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) and non-DSA anti-HLA antibodies develop in up to 50% of patients who stop immunosuppressive treatments immediately after an early allograft nephrectomy (3). Mechanisms leading to sensitization are incompletely explained, but could involve the persistence of the donor's antigens after allograft removal, particularly in the vascular patches (read more)

The old transplant recipient that becomes a liver donor

The success of transplantation has made it inevitable that there will be more transplant recipients that become potential cadaveric donors. The re-use of allografts and utilization of other organs from former transplant recipients will add to the limited donor pool. In addition, many transplant recipients will want the opportunity to donate in return. The following is a short report on two liver donors who were former transplant recipients (read more)

Are changes in HLA Ags responsible for leukemia relapse after HLA-matched allogeneic hematopoietic SCT?

Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) has been shown to be associated with leukemia relapse after haploidentical transplantation. Whether such changes are an important cause of relapse after HLA-matched transplantation remains unclear. We retrospectively HLA-typed leukemic blasts for 71 patients with AML/myelodysplastic syndrome obtained from stored samples, and the results were compared with those obtained at diagnosis and/or before the transplant. No LOH or any other changes in HLA Ag were found in any of the samples tested post transplant as compared with pretransplant specimens. One patient had LOH in HLA class I Ag (HLA-A,-B and -C); however, these changes were present in the pretransplant sample indicating that they occurred before the transplant. We concluded that, in contrast with haploidentical transplantation, HLA loss does not have a major role as a mechanism of relapse after allogeneic transplantation with a closely HLA-matched donor (read more)

Should HLA Mismatch Acceptability for Sensitized Transplant Candidates Be Determined at the High-Resolution Rather Than the Antigen Level?

Defining HLA mismatch acceptability of organ transplant donors for sensitized recipients has traditionally been based on serologically defined HLA antigens. Now, however, it is well accepted that HLA antibodies specifically recognize a wide range of epitopes present on HLA antigens and that molecularly defined high resolution alleles corresponding to the same low resolution antigen can possess different epitope repertoires. Hence, determination of HLA compatibility at the allele level represents a more accurate approach to identify suitable donors for sensitized patients. This approach would offer opportunities for increased transplant rates and improved long term graft survivals (read more and rebuttal)