ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation Is a Novel Risk Factor for BK Nephropathy

A link between ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation and the risk of BK virus allograft nephropathy (BKVAN) has been identified in a report from Johns Hopkins Hospital.1 The 11 (17.7%) of 62 cases of BKVAN were identified by protocol (n = 5) or indication (n = 6) biopsies. The incidence of BKVAN in HLA–incompatible allograft recipients (transplantation after the removal of donor-specific HLA antibodies) and compatible allograft recipients was 5.9% and 3.0%, respectively. In a multivariable analysis, ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation was identified as an independent risk factor for the development of BKVAN (read more)

Graft and Patient Survival Outcomes of a Third Kidney Transplant

Background: The waiting time for deceased donor renal transplantation in the United States continues to grow. Retransplant candidates make up a small but growing percentage of the overall transplant waiting list and raise questions about the stewardship of scarce resources. The utility of renal transplantation among individuals with two prior renal transplants is not described in the literature, and we thus sought to determine the survival benefit associated with a third kidney transplant (3KT). 

Methods: Multivariable Cox regression models were created to determine characteristics associated with 3KT outcomes and the survival benefit of 3KT among recipients wait listed and transplanted within the United States between 1995 and 2009. 

Results: A total of 4,334 patients were waitlisted for a 3KT and 2,492 patients received a 3KT. In a multivariate analysis, 3KT demonstrated an overall patient survival benefit compared to the waitlist (hazards ratio, 0.379; 95% confidence interval, 0.302-0.475; P < 0.001) for those awaiting their first, second, or third kidney transplants, although an inferior graft outcome compared to first kidney transplants. The time to survival benefit did not accrue until 8 months after transplantation. In addition, we found that the duration of second graft survival was predictive of third graft survival, such that second graft survival beyond 5 years is associated with superior 3KT graft survival. Second graft loss in 30 days or less was not associated with inferior 3KT graft survival. 

Conclusion: A 3KT achieves a survival benefit over remaining on the waitlist, although is associated with inferior graft outcomes compared to first kidney transplants. Graft survival of the second transplant beyond 5 years is associated with superior 3KT graft survival (read more).

A Phase I/II Placebo-Controlled Trial of C1-Inhibitor for Prevention of Antibody-Mediated Rejection in HLA Sensitized Patients

Background: Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a severe form of rejection, mediated primarily by antibody-dependent complement (C) activation. C1 inhibitor (C1-INH, Berinert) inhibits the classical and lectin pathways of C activation. We performed a randomized, placebo-controlled study using C1-INH in highly sensitized renal transplant recipients for prevention of AMR. 

Methods: Twenty highly sensitized patients desensitized with IVIG + rituximab ± plasma exchange were enrolled and randomized 1:1 to receive plasma-derived human C1-INH (20 IU/kg/dose) versus placebo intraoperatively, then twice weekly for 7 doses. Renal function, adverse events (AEs)/serious AEs, C3, C4, and C1-INH levels were monitored and C1q+ HLA antibodies were also blindly assessed.

Results: One patient in the C1-INH group versus 2 patients in the placebo group developed serious AEs, but none were related to study drug. Delayed graft function developed in 1 C1-INH subject and 4 in the placebo. The C1-INH trough levels increased with C1-INH treatment. C3 and C4 levels also increased significantly in the C1-INH group compared to placebo. No C1-INH patient developed AMR during the study. Two patients developed AMR after the study. Three placebo patients developed AMR, one during the study. C1q+ donor specific antibodies were reduced in 2 C1-INH treated patients tested, while immunoglobulin G DSA levels showed decreased binding for both groups. 

Conclusions: The C1-INH appears safe in the posttransplant period. The C1-INH treatment may reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury. The C1-INH also resulted in significant elevations of C1-INH levels, C3, C4, and reduced C1q+ HLA antibodies. Taken together, the combination of antibody reduction and C1-INH may prove useful in prevention of AMR. Further controlled studies are warranted (read more)

A closer look at rituximab induction on HLA antibody rebound following HLA-incompatible kidney transplantation

Rituximab has been used to increase the efficacy of desensitization protocols for human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-incompatible kidney transplantation; however, controlled comparisons have not been reported. Here we examined 256 post-transplant HLA antibody levels in 25 recipients desensitized with and 25 without rituximab induction, to determine the impact of B-cell depletion. We found significantly less HLA antibody rebound in the rituximab-treated patients (7% of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) and 33% of non-DSAs) compared with a control cohort desensitized and transplanted without rituximab (32% DSAs and 55% non-DSAs). The magnitude of the increase was significantly larger among patients who did not receive rituximab. Interestingly, in rituximab-treated patients, of the 39 HLA antibodies that increased post transplant, 34 were specific for HLA mismatches present in previous allografts or pregnancies, implying limited efficacy in memory B-cell depletion. Compared with controls, rituximab-treated patients had a significantly greater mean reduction in DSA (−2505 vs. −292 mean fluorescence intensity), but a similar rate of DSA persistence (52% in rituximab treated-and 40% in non-treated recipients). Thus, rituximab induction in HLA-incompatible recipients reduced the incidence and magnitude of HLA antibody rebound, but did not affect DSA elimination, antibody-mediated rejection, or 5-year allograft survival when compared with recipients desensitized and transplanted without rituximab (read more)

Pre-transplant Virtual PRA and Long-term Outcomes of Kidney Transplant Recipients

Virtual Panel Reactive Antibodies (vPRA) has been implemented to gauge sensitization worldwide. It is unclear how it associates with long-term outcomes, and its correlation with peak (pPRA) or actual (aPRA) has not been studied. We retrospectively reviewed data from 18-65 year-old kidney-only transplant patients during 1.1.1996–31.7.2011 in our centre. PRAs were calculated based on solid-phase techniques. Of the 726 qualified cases, regardless of the PRA type, sensitized patients (PRA>5%) had more females and previous transplant. Highly sensitized (HS, PRA>50%) had longer waiting time, lower transplant rate, less living donor, more delayed graft function and acute rejection. The conformity between vPRA and pPRA in HS were 75%, 57% between pPRA and aPRA. Forty-three percent (61/142) patients whose pPRA was >5% had no detectable aPRA and maintained similar outcomes as sensitized patients. Multivariate analysis showed consistently lower death-censored graft survival in HS defined by vPRA [HR 2.086 (95% CI 1.078-4.037), P<0.05] and pPRA [HR 2.139 (95% CI 1.024-4.487), P<0.05]. Both vPRA and pPRA provided reliable way estimating sensitization and predicting long-term graft survival, while aPRA might underestimate true sensitization. vPRA might be the most objective parameter to gauge sensitization (read more)

KIR and HLA genotypes have no identifiable role in single-unit dominance following double-unit umbilical cord blood transplantation

In this cohort of 83 double-unit CBT recipients, we failed to find an association between KIR and HLA genotypes with unit dominance. However, our small sample size and the limited number of CB pairs with unilateral NK alloreactivity may have precluded us in finding an association if one exists. The role of KIR and HLA genotypes in unit dominance still cannot be excluded and larger studies investigating this question are warranted (read more)

Facial transplantation: the first 9 years

Since the first facial transplantation in 2005, 28 have been done worldwide with encouraging immunological, functional, psychological, and aesthetic outcomes. Unlike solid organ transplantation, which is potentially life-saving, facial transplantation is life-changing. This difference has generated ethical concerns about the exposure of otherwise young and healthy individuals to the sequelae of lifelong, high-dose, multidrug immunosuppression. Nevertheless, advances in immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive protocols, microsurgical techniques, and computer-aided surgical planning have enabled broader clinical application of this procedure to patients. Although episodes of acute skin rejection continue to pose a serious threat to face transplant recipients, all cases have been controlled with conventional immunosuppressive regimens, and no cases of chronic rejection have been reported (read more)